Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay solution

Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay

Instructions:

Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay

The major similarities of U.S GAAP and IFRS come from the similar models they use as well as earnings per share both understand stock-based compensation built upon the similar model they both follow.

The differences between GAAP and IFRS come from the different characteristics of debt and equity coming from the accounting for securities. GAAP uses long term debt that proceeds convertible debt and IFRS convertible bonds are bifurcated into equity. It is said that the major difference also comes from the fact that IFRS is principal based while GAAP is rule based. IFRS does not allow the use of the last in, first out accounting methods whereas GAAP does.

I would personally choose IFRS because it more widely used as it is starting to become the global standard for preparing financial statements for companies. This would bring less confusion if these was the only one used IFRS also reports any long-term assets using the best accounting standards to insure accurate financial statements which can be comparable to foreign countries.

This makes the IFRS more interesting to me. GAAP does not use documentations such as replacement cost or current market value, they rely only of the original amount paid.

References

Miller-Nobles, T. L., Mattison, B. L., & Horngrens, E. M. (n.d.). Financial & Managerial Accounting 6th edition.

Module 4 Discussion

Contains unread posts

Principals of Financial Accounting ACC-201-OL02 Module 4 Discussion

Discuss the major similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.

Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP) have a strict adherence to rules developed in the US enforced by the SEC. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) allow for professional decision making in record keeping while still following basic guidelines for financial reporting.

For example, both GAAP and IFRS require the use of balance sheets and income statements. Both also require retained earnings or cash flow to be used. Additionally, both GAAP and IFRS follow the same equation for calculating value Assets = Liabilities + Equities. Where GAAP and IFRS vary is in the value of assets and the write off debts.

For example, GAAP requires the purchase price to be used when recording value. IFRS allows the business to record current fair value, including the periodic reassessment of value. GAAP allows for businesses to determine when a debt is noncollectable, where IFRS standards are stricter.

Which of the differences do you find most interesting?

In reviewing the two accepted accounting practices, GAAP and IFRS, what I found most interesting was how the IFRS allows companies to record fluctuating value of the same item based on current fair pricing. This practice would cause equity to fluctuate based on the economy rather than purchase price and could cause ever shifting balance sheets.

Would you choose the U.S. GAAP or IFRS method? Why?

I would choose the GAAP method. The method covers all required reporting, but also leaves very little discretionary entries. This type of reporting creates a clear recording method.

References

Miller-Nobles, T. L., Mattison, B. L., & Matsumura, E. M. (2017). Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting 6th Edition. New York: Pearson.

Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay

Module 4 similarities between U.S GAAP and IFRS Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!