Morgan Spurlock. Showtime Independent Films, 2004 Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Morgan Spurlock. Showtime Independent Films, 2004 Assignment
Super-Size Me Assignment
Super-Size Me. Dir. Morgan Spurlock. Showtime Independent Films, 2004.
https://watchdocumentaries.com/super-size-me/
The aim of this assignment is twofold:
Thesis and supporting argument of the film: In the first section of your response, you need to state clearly what you take to be the thesis of the film, i.e., the film’s overarching message.
Once you have identified that overarching message, list 2 to 3 of the main ways in which the film makes a case for that thesis. This section should be about 200 words long.
- Your analysis of the argument: In the second section of the paper, you will provide a critical engagement with the argument the film is making. Do you find the argument persuasive? Why or why not? Give thoughtful, convincing reasons for your position. This section should be about 200 words long.
Note that although there is considerable leeway in how you might read and interpret the film, we are viewing this film in the context of a discussion of product safety and liability.
Your analysis of the thesis and main argument of the film should at least touch on these topics, as they are no doubt central to the film. You might find Brinker’s framework for assessing strict liability useful for your analysis, although it is not required that you use this framework in your response. Please see the next page for details on how to submit your assignment.
Tuff X
Philosophy 312
Professor
Film Response Assignment #1: Super-Size Me
Thesis and supporting argument of the film: The main point of Super-Size Me is that McDonald’s is [insert what you believe the thesis to be here].
The film makes the case for this thesis by showing that McDonald’s is engaged in . . . [insert what you take to be the 2-3 key supporting points the film makes in support of this thesis; this section should be tight and focused].
Make this section about 200 words in length; and, yes, you should type the assignment with single spacing. Write clearly and in complete sentences. Finally, make sure your assignment is free of grammatical and typographical errors.
Analysis of the argument: I found Super-Size Me’s main argument to be [persuasive or unpersuasive, convincing or unconvincing, etc.]. At this point, you will begin to build your case for what you think of the film’s argument. This section should also be about 200 words.
End of sample format for assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow