Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper is a list of the music that was performed during the program.
1. Program/music performed list
a. Each piece’s title and composer.
2. A brief summary of the musicians/performers (1-2 paragraphs)
a. What kind of instruments are you using? What musical genre(s) do you prefer? What country are they from? Is there anything distinctive or fascinating about this performance?
3. A 1-2 paragraph explanation of the performance components
a. Use musical terms to describe the performance (timbre, rhythm, form, style, etc.)
b. Use musical terms to describe the quality of the performance (pitch, rhythmic alignment, articulations, uniformity of style, etc.)
4. A 1-2 paragraph description of the performance’s expressive aspects
a. What mood/emotion/character/feeling did the performance convey?
b. How successful were the musicians in creating the desired atmosphere, emotion, character, or feeling?
c. Were you pleased with the performance? What did you think of the music? Would you suggest it?
d. Compose an informed aesthetic evaluation based on all aspects of the performance.
5. Provide evidence that you were present.
a. Physical proof: a ticket stub, a program, or a photograph of you there
b. A description of something special about the concert that only those who were present would know
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Musical performance program list paper |
Musical performance program list paper