My Friend Invited Me to a Family Function at Her House Discussion

July 12, 2021

My Friend Invited Me to a Family Function at Her House Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

You’ll use your imagination, demonstrate some familiarity with the material, and have a little fun for this discussion!

Imagine you are Antoine Roquentin when you wake up one morning. This may or may not be your ideal situation, but it is what it is! Give an example of a typical day in your life. (Keep in mind that you haven’t solved your “problem” yet.) You play Roquentin throughout the novel, not just at the end).

Make at least two references to ideas or situations from the book in your essay. Don’t just go off on a tangent now! Also, please maintain a respectful tone! To make your portrayal more compelling, do some research. Make an effort to immerse yourself in the role.

Your post should be at least 400 words long, excluding any quotations, but it can be longer! Make sure you read the rubric for this forum carefully so you understand how your post will be graded.

At this time, do not respond to another’s post. We’ll go over these again next week.

My Friend Invited Me to a Family Function at Her House Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met