Nonconscious Effects Of Scent On Cognition And Behavior

March 5, 2022

Nonconscious Effects Of Scent On Cognition And Behavior

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Nonconscious Effects Of Scent On Cognition And Behavior

There is a danger of tragedy and/or law suits in this case. What would you have done?

There is a very old joke told about a patient who asks a doctor before a procedure: “Will I be able to play the piano after this?” It rather spoils the joke if the doctor asks: “Can you play the piano now?”

I realize that all of you in this class have had some training in health care, or have studied health care systems, or have watched health care professionals practice their care. So, you won’t be surprised at the dictum – First do no harm. Now, in this chapter is the additional admonition – do so with compassion.

We want to be treated with compassion when we need health care and so does everyone else. We want to know what the procedure entails; what is the recovery time? How long will I be off work? Will there be much pain involved? How much will this cost? These issues and many more are what may be covered in the reasonable patient disclosure.

Most of us would personally like to have more information as the serious nature of the procedure increases. Think about this for yourself. What would you want to know?

The items which the health care professional needs to be fully aware of are:

Who is my patient?

How will this affect their life or their lifestyle?

What family or responsibility issues are involved?

Are their any residual consequences of this procedure?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met