NOVA CST 100 Informative speech Nonprofit organization Essay Solution

September 20, 2022

NOVA CST 100 Informative speech Nonprofit organization Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

NOVA CST 100 Informative speech Nonprofit organization Essay

Discussion: Informative Speech Observations

This discussion board will put your ability to analyze a speech performance using our informative speech rubric to the test.

Watch the informative speeches below.

Select 1 speech to review.

Using the informative speech rubric, analyze the performance. What overall grade would you give the performer? What areas of the rubric do you feel the performer exceeded expectations? Why? What were the opportunities for growth? Make at least 1 suggestion on how the speech could be improved upon. Identify one thing that this speaker did well that you want to do in your informative speech performance.

https://youtu.be/KCugpoPN198

https://youtu.be/2f3xIEmNYuw

https://youtu.be/j1qKJ40S8Jo

CST 100 Nova Southeastern University Principle of Public Speaking Essay

Select 3 of the following speeches to watch. Analyze these speeches based on the elements of delivery (Part 5 in the O’hair book). What method of delivery do you think is used? How did the speaker use their voice to create interest, motivate the audience to listen, and establish ethos? How did the speaker use their body? Were they moving around a lot? Did their movement seem purposeful? What role, if any did gestures play in their speech performance? What areas of delivery do you think the speaker could have improved upon? How will you take this information into account when preparing for your upcoming informative and persuasive speeches?

Persuasive Speech Exemplar – ‘Nap Time’ – YouTube

Ronald Reagan: “Mr. Gorbachev, Tear Down This Wall!” – YouTube

Halle Berry Wins Best Actress: 74th Oscars (2002) – YouTube

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met