Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nurse Practitioners as Primary Care Providers Discussion Response
For this discussion, I selected a peer-reviewed journal article by Poghosyan et al., (2017) titled Nurse Practitioners as Primary Care Providers with their Own Patient Panels and Organizational Structures: A Cross-Sectional Study. The article was of particular interest to me as it pertains to my practice area as a future Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP).
It identifies the challenges likely to be faced in today’s rapidly transforming healthcare system and the impact of an overall shortage in primary care physicians. At the core of this study are suggestions on how best to improve the primary care capacity of FNPs operating in the United States to bolster the continuous provision of care.
My article search was conducted on EBSCOhost; a leading online repository for peer-reviewed journal articles. The database’s reputation as an intuitive research platform informed by detailed resources was a major reason that informed my choice. However, one of the main difficulties experienced during this endeavor encompassed authentication problems.
After logging in, starting my search, and skimming through the result, I was routinely taken off-site by the server for re-authentication as standard procedure. This was problematic and cumbersome since it meant that I had to conduct my search again from scratch and with a significant impact on my workflow.
Furthermore, I had to make a considerable number of clicks in the search engine since the results returned numerous articles; with others being unrelated to my initial search with significant impact on my end-user experience.
I also experienced great difficulty viewing the articles with Google Chrome and had to switch to Safari. After troubleshooting, I soon realized that the problem was as a direct consequence of an inherent incompatibility between the EBCOhost database and the Chrome PDF viewer plugin.
Moreover, the EBCOhost database would also be useful to my colleagues. It is based on a responsive and user-friendly design which allows users to conduct searches easily while following a highly systematized path. The website is also well-maintained by a dedicated technical support team, always ready to resolve user concerns.
Furthermore, my user experience was improved by the fact that the website also provided instructional information to guide users in configuring the initial search. This optimal experience enabled me to search the database with limited challenges and was finally able to pinpoint the most suitable resource for this particular assignment.
Additionally, the website also provided full-text access to the article resources and consistently worked to ensure that impediments to accessing the resources were removed. A functional link to full-text access was always available which improved my experience searching for the most reliable sources in an exclusive access database.
I would also recommend EBCOhost to my colleagues. It is accessible and contains high-quality peer-reviewed journal articles often supported by academics globally. The information contained in the website is also reliable since it stems from accredited experts. Search results are also unfiltered and also feature a brief article summary to inform user’s choice in the long run.
Furthermore, the website also contains a dedicated citation generator which makes it possible for users to catalogue resources to suit individual preferences. With EBCOhost, I was eventually able to narrow down my results and identify my area of interest without having to worry about distractions by pop-up ads.
References
Poghosyan, L., Liu, J., & Norful, A. A. (2017). Nurse practitioners as primary care providers with their own patient panels and organizational structures: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 74, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.05.004
Nurse Practitioners as Primary Care Providers Discussion Response
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Nurse Practitioners as Primary Care Providers Discussion Response |
Nurse Practitioners as Primary Care Providers Discussion Response