Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nursing Discussion on Wearable Technology
As a HIM professional, you should be aware that cybersecurity is a serious issue in the healthcare industry. Medical equipment and consumer wearables may be able to communicate with hospital EHRs thanks to the Internet of Things. However, the current state of security in many medical devices poses a risk of hackers gaining easy access to healthcare provider systems and stealing vast volumes of sensitive data.
Take a look at this video: Todd Coleman discusses health-related tattoos.
At a time when personal, wearable technology is exploding, it’s critical that health-care executives keep ahead of the security curve.
Determine the dangers of using wearable technologies.
Include the following elements in your project:
Do you utilize any kind of wearable technology right now?
What are your thoughts on the security of wearable technology?
Take a look at the following website: Apple’s Wellness Kit
Are there any guarantees about the security of these products?
Consider whether the advantages of wearables exceed the risks.
How might you, as a health information manager, address this great improvement in health care while minimizing (reducing) the risks?
This is a 1-2 page informal reflection paper. Make a list of all the sources you used. Grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are all required as always.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Nursing Discussion on Wearable Technology