Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice
Analyzing Published Research Purpose is a required uniform assignment.
The goal of this paper is to interpret the two articles that were determined to be the most relevant to the group’s topic.
SUCCESS OF THE COURSE
The student can complete this assignment to meet the following course objectives:
CO 2: Interpret the findings of published research studies using research principles. (Policy Objectives #4 and #8)
CO 4: Assess the credibility and clinical significance of published nursing research in relation to evidence-based practice. (Policy Objectives #4 and #8)
DEADLINE
Information on due dates can be found on the course calendar. This activity is covered by the college’s Late Assignment Policy.
A TOTAL OF 200 POINTS ARE POSSIBLE. REQUIREMENTS
The following will be included in the paper.
1. A clinical inquiry
a. Problem description b. Problem significance c. Paper purpose
2. A summary of the findings
a. Summarize the basics in the Matrix Table found in e-College Assignment Documents.
b. Describe the following: i. concepts, ii. methods used, iii. participants, iv. instruments, including reliability and validity, and v. response to the Purpose question vi. Determine the next step for the group
3. The paper’s conclusion
4. Layout
a. Use of headings for each section b. Correct grammar and spelling
Evidence-Based Practice (NR449)
d. Page length: three pages c. Use of APA format (sixth edition)
GETTING THE PAPER READY
1. Make sure you don’t have any duplicate articles in your group.
2. A title page and a reference page should be included in the paper.
DIRECTIONS AND CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNMENT
AssignmentsCriteriasPoints percent of the total
30 15 percent of clinical questions
1. Define the problem: What is the focus of your group’s efforts?
2. The problem’s importance is described: What health outcomes do you expect as a result of your problem? Or what evidence do you have that this is a problem? You might be able to get help from government or professional organization websites.
3. What is the purpose of your paper? What will your paper be about or what will it accomplish? The goal of this paper is to…, says the author.
**Please keep in mind that while most of these questions are similar to those you answered in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. For items 1 and 2 above, you can use your work from paper 1, including any suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. The third point should be unique to this paper.
Findings are described as follows: 60 30 percent in summary
In the appendix, create a matrix table that summarizes the main points of each article.
Findings are described as follows:
60/30 percent description
Describe the following in the body of the paper.
What concepts were investigated?
What techniques were used?
Who are the samples’ participants or members?
What kind of instruments were used? Is there a description of the authors’ reliability and validity?
How do you respond to your original question about the “purpose of this paper”?
Are the findings of the articles sufficient to support your answers? If so, how would you go about doing it? If not, what else do you need to know in order to respond to your question?
What are the requirements for the next step? Determine two questions that will serve as a guide for the group’s work.
Findings are described as follows: 20 ten percent conclusion
Conclusion: In a summary paragraph, go over the main points of your paper.
Format 15 percent (30%)
1. Spelling and grammar are correct.
2. For each section, use headings: Problem, Literature Review (Concepts, Methods, Participants, Instruments, Implications for Future Research), and Conclusion
3. APA format (sixth edition): Appendices are listed after the references.
4. Length of paper: three pages
100 percent total 200
RUA Analyzing Published Research.docx (NR449 RUA Analyzing Published Research.docx) (NR449 RUA Analyzing Published 2 NR449 Evidence-Based Practice (Revised 07/25/2016)
NR449 RUA Analyzing Published Research.docx NR449 RUA Analyzing Published Research.docx NR449 RUA Analyzing Published Research.docx NR449 RUA Ana
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice |
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice