Online Racial Identity Models Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Online Racial Identity Models Discussion Essay
Based on your readings this week, describe the racial identity models and discuss your own identity and what influences impacted how you see yourself in relation to these models and your stage of personal cultural development. What biases and prejudices do you have yet to address or confront in order to elevate your level of professional practice and multicultural competency? 300 words, supporting your comments with two references
REFERENCES: Diller, J. V. (2019). Cultural diversity: A primer for the human services (6th ed.). Cengage.
Chapter 4: Understanding Racism, Prejudice, and White Privilege
Chapter 5: Understanding Culture and Cultural DifferencesForest-Band, S., Jenson, J.M. (2015).
Differences in experiences of racial and ethnic microaggression among Asian, Latino/Hispanic, Black, and White young adults. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 42(1), 141-161.
The full-text version of this article can be accessed through the EBSCOhost database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. The authors present findings from a study measuring respondents’ experiences of racial and ethnic microaggressions and discuss implications for policy and practice.
Gastelaars, M., & Haar, M. V. (2007). Facing culture: the (de)legitimation of social work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(11/12), 447-459. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.
Online Racial Identity Models Discussion Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow