Optimizing Learning in College Psychological Science assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Optimizing Learning in College Psychological Science assignment
This week we covered chapter 1,2, and 3. The assignment is (Discussion post) 1 to 3 paragraphs (you don’t have to write a reference, if you do please use the one I have uploaded)
The assignment is:
Please read the following Psychological Science article: Optimizing Learning in College: Tips from Cognitive Psychology . I wanted to start the course by reviewing an article with a real-world application. The authors will provide suggestions on how to approach taking courses in college. They rely on demonstrated principles from the Cognitive Psychology literature to inform readers about the best strategies to succeed in a course. This article should give you a feel for how the principles of cognitive psychology can be applied in the classroom. It will be useful for you to read the information in the textbook related to encoding, storage, and recall to produce a high quality primary post.
In your primary post, please answer the following questions:
- Why are strategies like highlighting (or underlining) as you read, and rereading your text and/or notes often ineffective for learning material?
- Describe the read, recite, and review method. Why is this an effective method for remembering information from your textbook and/or lecture notes?
- Based on the reading, why might a professor have a no laptop policy in the classroom?
- Why are spaced practice and retrieval practice effective study strategies?
- What strategies from this article do you think you could successfully implement in this course, or other courses?
Note:
- 1 to 3 paragraphs is enough.
- I have uploaded chapter 1,2 ,and 3 from the book “Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind” + the article “Optimizing Learning in College: Tips from Cognitive Psychology”.
- Please check the (Rubrics
Optimizing Learning in College Psychological Science assignment
Points Awarded
0-‐1 2-‐3 4-‐5 6 Criteria Primary Post addresses few, if any, aspects of the assignment, and demonstrates little to no
understanding
of the subject
matter.
Primary Post indicates that you may not have paid attention to the assignment’s Instructions or subject matter. The ideas presented in the post are not original or supported by course material. The post is largely Based on your personal opinion and experiences.
Primary Post addresses most of the aspects of the assignment. The ideas presented in the post demonstrate some understanding of the academic subject matter. Your post is supported by incomplete, or anecdotal evidence. Your positing addresses all aspects of the assignment. The ideas presented in The post demonstrates a thoughtful consideration of the academic subject matter. Your post is Supported by strong evidence from the course material.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Optimizing Learning in College Psychological Science assignment