Organizational Dynamics: Power and Influence Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Organizational Dynamics: Power and Influence Case Study Assignment
Module 3 – Case
Organizational Dynamics: Power & Influence
Assignment Overview
As a health care leader of tomorrow, it is important that you not only understand power and influence, but are also able to manage them properly.
There are many forms and sources of power and influence. To gather an appreciation for them both, we must know how they equally work and where we are in using them.
Case Assignment
Step 1: Read the following short articles:
Bacon, T. (2010). How power works. Retrieved from http://www.theelementsofpower.com/index.cfm/how-power-works/
Bacon, T. (2010). How influence works. Retrieved from http://www.theelementsofpower.com/index.cfm/how-influence-works/
Step 2: Take the “Influence Effectiveness” and “Power Source” Self-Assessments at the following source:
Bacon, T. (2010). Self assessments. Retrieved from http://www.theelementsofpower.com/power-and-influence-self-assessments/
**Copy your results chart (as a jpeg) for each assessment into an appendix of your paper. The result chart should look similar to the below image:
Step 3: Based on your required readings and additional research, prepare a 3- to 4-page paper completing/answering the following:
Introduction:
Explain the importance of the balance of power and influence.
Body:
Describe the five sources of power: Reward, Coercive, Legitimate, Referent, and Expert.
Explain the four clusters of upward influence: Shotgun, Tactician, Bystander, and Ingratiator.
Explain your results for each assessment.
Were you surprised by your results or were they what you expected?
Identity one of the five sources of power that you most identify with based on your results. Explain your rationale.
Identify one of the four clusters of upward influence. Explain your rationale.
Conclusion:
Rationalize the important findings of your paper to a career as a health care professional.
Include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.
Assignment Expectations
Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your thoughts and analysis.
Limit your response to a maximum of 4 pages, not including the title page, reference page, or appendices.
Support your proposal with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php.
You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
Georgetown University Library (n.d.) Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow