Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PAD4822 Fracking Conflicts in New York City and Texas
For this class i have an individual case study. With this topic there will be a later assignment due with it, later in the month. If you agree with this assignment, All i ask for you to be available for the final Case study assignment down the road due to it would be base on the topic you choose. Thank you.
Submit two potential intergovernmental topics to me for your case study, and rank them (#1, #2). Explain in a sentence or two a little more about the topic. The more applications the topic has to the course material (legal, fiscal, political, administrative aspects of intergovernmental administration), the easier it will be for you to complete the assignment. Make sure you can easily identify the two different levels of government, government organizations, or groups that make the topic intergovernmental. Where there is a difference of opinion between democrats and republicans is not really intergovernmental, it is purely political. Where the Federal Government differs from the State in an action (rules, mandates, guidance, court case), that is an intergovernmental topic.
You may not use a topic we cover extensively in class (e.g. certain aspects of DACA, ACA court case, etc., or any of the topics from the group case study). There are some topics that we only talked about briefly (e.g. marijuana laws, regional environmental laws) that you may be able to use – just run them by me first.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PAD4822 Fracking Conflicts in New York City and Texas |
PAD4822 Fracking Conflicts in New York City and Texas