Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PAD4822 Race and Ethnicity Brain Builder Discussion
We’ve reviewed several specific policy areas as well as the legal and political aspects of intergovernmental relations so far in this course. Answer the following two questions based on the readings in a short-answer assignment of about 8-10 sentences for each question. You must reference the book at least once in your response. To reference the book for this assignment means you cite the author of the chapter, year the chapter was written, and provide a page number that you are drawing the content from. For example, if I want to discuss Lina Newton’s example of Arizona’s Legal Arizona Worker’s Act, I would include (Newton, 2012, p. 355) as my citation. You do not need a full reference for this assignment, just a citation.
You can either upload a file or use text entry for your answer.
Required Text – O’Toole, L. J., & Christensen, R. K. (Eds.) (2013). American Intergovernmental Relations: Foundations, Perspectives and Issues, 5th Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. ISBN: 978-1-4522-2629-3. (purchase) (abbreviated as O&C in course schedule)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PAD4822 Race and Ethnicity Brain Builder Discussion |
PAD4822 Race and Ethnicity Brain Builder Discussion