Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paris Climate Agreement Discussion Essay Assignment
Read the following articles and consider “What is the outlook for climate change based on what you read in these articles? What makes you think that?”:
UN urges global emissions cuts and warns of ‘bleak’ climate change outlook
The Paris Climate Agreement What You Need to Know – The New York Times
Read the following article and think about “Why has it been suggested that eating less meat will help with climate change?”:
How Eating Less Meat Could Help Protect the Planet From Climate Change
DISCUSSION POST:
Using the above 3 articles as the basis for your discussion, please respond to the two questions below. In your initial discussion, please be sure to address each individual question specifically.
Questions to Address in the Discussion:
What is the outlook for climate change based on what you read in the first 2 articles? What makes you form your opinion?
Why has it been suggested that eating less meat will help with climate change, based on the 3rd article?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Paris Climate Agreement Discussion Essay Assignment |
Paris Climate Agreement Discussion Essay Assignment