Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Because it is a philosophy subject, you must choose either pro or con and write as much as you can about it. Since it is a philosophy subject, you must write 5 pages, but would you like to write more? You will choose one of the eight arguments from pages 19 to 35 in the pdf file that I have attached. The book is too large to upload, and I was unable to do so. Here is a link to the book. https://sa1lib.org/book/5399184/3ec9e2 I’ve tried copying and pasting the book, but it would be clearer if the link and the book were combined.
Pro Argumentative Essay (5 pages)
Introduction to the Pro: The author (fill in the blanks) makes the following controversial claim: (give conclusion). He bases his conclusion on the following premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise) (give second premise). This essay will examine each premise in light of objectors’ objections before defending the author against them.
Give an example of a possible objection to the first premise.
To the first objection, I’d like to reply (give pointed reply).
Provide an example of a possible objection to the second premise (include the objection(s)).
Reply to the second point of contention (give pointed reply).
Theoretical evidence (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)
The Importance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).
Essay on the Negative (5 pages)
Introduction to the disadvantages: The author (fill in the blanks) makes a case for the following contentious conclusion (give conclusion). He bases his argument on two dubious premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise) (give second premise). The thesis of this paper will be that these premises are incorrect, leaving the conclusion unproven.
The first premise is contested (give objection).
The author responds with a counter-argument (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)
Counter-argument to the author (show how the author’s response is insufficient)
The second premise is contested (give objection).
The author responds with a counter-argument (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)
Counter-argument to the author (show how the author’s response is insufficient)
Theoretical evidence (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)
The Importance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Perfect Friendship Essay by Boylan Virtual Ethics |
Perfect Friendship Essay by Boylan Virtual Ethics