Personal History of Nutrition and Eating Discussion

Personal History of Nutrition and Eating Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Personal History of Nutrition and Eating Discussion

In no less than 3+ written pages (double space), describe your personal history of nutrition and eating. Use the questions below to guide your writing, and you are encouraged to go beyond this list.

1. What is your first memory of eating? What were your first favorite foods? Were any foods restricted when you were young?
2. What messages did you get about food when you were young? (good/bad foods? This food will make you hyper/strong/etc.) Where did these messages come from (parents, siblings, school, doctor, etc.)?
3. How and where did you eat as a child? (in the car, never at restaurants, in front of the TV/computer?)
4. How would you describe your eating now? Personal History of Nutrition and Eating Discussion
5. What influences what and how you eat now?
6. How do you think what you were told and exposed to as a young person has impacted your attitude/mental models* towards food and eating?
7. Are you trying to make any changes in your eating behaviors? How long have you been working on these changes?
8. If applicable, what strengths do you bring to this class (background in biology, work at a grocery store)?

Personal History of Nutrition and Eating Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!