Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Personal Inventory and Worldview Analysis
Write a commentary on worldview based on the required topic study materials and react to the following:
Explain the Christian perspective on spirituality and ethics in contrast to postmodern relativism’s stance on health care in 250-300 words.
Explain what scientism is and two of the primary arguments against it in 250-300 words.
Answer each of the worldview questions in 750-1,000 words, based on your own personal perspective and worldview:
What is the definition of ultimate reality?
What is the universe’s nature?
What is the definition of a human being?
What exactly is knowledge?
What is your ethical foundation?
What exactly is the point of your existence?
Remember to use the topic study resources to back up your reflection.
While APA style is not needed for the body of the work, good academic writing is anticipated, and source documentation should follow APA formatting rules, which may be found in the Student Success Center’s APA Style Guide.
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for a successful completion.
Requirements: Observe the instructions.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Personal Inventory and Worldview Analysis |
Personal Inventory and Worldview Analysis