Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Personhood and Artificial Intelligence
AI and PersonhoodSaudi Arabia recently granted Sophia, a robot, the status of citizen. Read this article about Sophia and see her speak in front of a live audience in the video below. What conditions, given recent advances in the development of sophisticated AI, would you require for you to consider such AI to be ‘persons’? If you wouldn’t consider them people under any circumstances, explain why. Include a specific reference to one or both of the excerpts from John R. Searle on pages 355-356 of our text in your response. What is his take on AI as a person/potential person? NB: Students frequently post comments in this thread such as ‘AI will never be human’ or ‘no, I do not and will not consider AI to be human.’ BUT!!! It’s worth noting that we’re debating whether AI should be considered persons rather than humans. Clearly, being human necessitates having human DNA and other characteristics, so AI cannot be human. Make sure to keep your comments focused on AI’s potential personhood. Make sure to follow the instructions in the Discussion Forums in Unit 1: For making specific references to texts, videos, and podcasts, see the Protocol and Grading Criteria folder; posts that do not follow these instructions will not receive full credit. Works Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller Meet the First-Ever Robot Citizen, Sophia, a Humanoid Who Once Threatened to ‘Destroy Humans.’ Business Insider, October 27, 2017. Meet Sophia, the robot citizen who threatened to “destroy humans” – Business Insider. On the 19th of August, 2020, I was able to get a hold of some information Interview with Sophia, the Lifelike Hot Robot. CNBC uploaded this video to YouTube on October 25, 2017. Full Interview With Sophia, The Lifelike Hot Robot | CNBC – YouTube On the 19th of August, 2020, I was able to get a hold of some information
Is It True That We Have Free Will?
Is It True That We Have Free Will?
[Make sure you’ve read Section C of Chapter 7 before continuing with this thread.]
Baron d’Holbach presents the argument known as hard determinism in his book System of Nature (p. 446 in our text), which claims that free will does not exist and is an illusion. Give a 3- to 4-sentence summary of his argument that we don’t have free will for this discussion, and then respond to his argument. Also, watch the video below, in which philosopher and neuroscientist Sam Harris presents a thought experiment to demonstrate that free will does not exist, and then write about your reaction to it. Is Harris able to persuade you of his point of view? Why do you think that is? Finally, how can you defend your position if you believe you have free will? Students frequently assert “I have free will because I make choices” or “I have free will because I can do whatever I want” during this discussion. However, such responses fall prey to the begging of the question fallacy. Such claims essentially state, “I have free will because I have free will.” Attempt to avoid this fallacy in your response. Make sure to follow the instructions for making specific references to texts, videos, and podcasts in Unit 1 in the Discussion Forums: Protocol and Grading Criteria folder; posts that do not follow these instructions will not receive full credit.
Works Sam Harris Free Will Thought Experiment, YouTube, 4 Nov. 2018, uploaded by Critical Thoughts. YouTube – Sam Harris’s Free Will Thought Experiment. On the 4th of May, 2020, I was able to get a hold of
Personhood and Artificial Intelligence Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Personhood and Artificial Intelligence Discussion |
Personhood and Artificial Intelligence Discussion