Persuasion By Medical Professionals In The Public Health Field
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Persuasion By Medical Professionals In The Public Health Field
Assistance is needed in answering the following Seminar questions:
In the Seminar, you will discuss the use of persuasion by medical professionals in the public health field. This is problematic in a number of ways described in your readings. Prior to the Seminar, give some thought to the use of persuasion by human service professionals and the impact this can have on a client and the helping relationship. It may be helpful to conduct additional research on this issue as well.
Persuasion By Medical Professionals In The Public Health Field
Please come to Seminar prepared to discuss the following:
What information did you learn from your own research about the use of persuasion with clients?
Do you think this practice is harmful to the helping relationship? If so, how? Is it unethical? If so, why?
How do you think this behavior impacts the following parties: The client? The helping relationship? The human service professional? Society as a whole?
APA Format, In-Text Citation & Reference(s). 450 Word Min. Please and Thank You.
Persuasion By Medical Professionals In The Public Health Field
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Persuasion By Medical Professionals In The Public Health Field