PHIL 2306 HCCS Is Social Media Healthy for Humanity Essay

PHIL 2306 HCCS Is Social Media Healthy for Humanity Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

PHIL 2306 HCCS Is Social Media Healthy for Humanity Essay

Description

The knee-jerk reaction is the way of society, right now, eh?

“In my opinion…”

Have you learned to consider, to look deeper into things, to research — to do some philosophy??

To make your time and life count??

Consider this URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_philosophy (Links to an external site.)/ (Links to an external site.) – you see that uncertainties run deeper than racism, politics, religions, and inequality.

What is yours — what issue is your passion?

DIG INTO something you really care about: cats, sports, fashion, cats, health care, engineering, dogs, cooking, cats… for whatever you have a passion — a show me in five (or so) pages that you can understand it with some philosophical depth when it comes to the ethics involved. The Philosophy of My Love and Reason for Living!!! Well, yeah… not quite that crazy.

Need at least five quotes/facts from respected thinkers to back your ideas, MLA heading, abstract, cites, works cited — the usual stuff.

Learn deeply.

PHIL 2306 HCCS Is Social Media Healthy for Humanity Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!