Plagiarism and Academic Honesty Lecture
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Plagiarism and Academic Honesty Lecture
While you have most likely heard the term plagiarism before, I’d like us to review the concept and discuss what constitutes plagiarism and academic dishonesty. You should know that plagiarism is a serious academic offense and all students caught plagiarizing or cheating on any assignments (discussion posts, essays, etc.) in this course will be referred to the Office of Student Conduct. Please make sure you read the following information carefully as you will be held responsible for all the information in this discussion.
In writing classes, plagiarism tends to refer to the use of material written by others but submitted by a student as though it is his or her own work. Under this general definition, the University of Texas at Arlington First Year Writing Program considers the following acts of plagiarism:
- submission of a complete text not written by the student, which may have been downloaded from the Internet or taken from other sources such as student paper files;
- liberal cutting and pasting of sources into the student’s text without attribution;
- liberal cutting and pasting of sources, which may include close paraphrase or adoption of whole sentences, mixed with the student’s own language, with attribution but without the use of quotation marks to indicate language borrowed from other sources;
- occasional misuse of sources, with or without attribution, for example, occasional sentences that do not “sound” like the student writer’s typical prose that may include citation at the end of the paragraph but no quotation marks indicating a direct quote;
- work done by the student for another class but passed off as new, original work.
Plagiarism is also failing to correctly indicate places where you are making use of another’s work. It is your responsibility to familiarize yourself with the conventions of citation by which you indicate which ideas are not your own and where your reader can find those sources. Read your textbook and handbook for more information on quoting and citing properly to avoid plagiarism. If you still do not understand, ask your instructor. Also, please note that students will not be pardoned from suspected plagiarism and a Student Conduct referral by stating that they didn’t know they were plagiarizing or claiming that they turned in the wrong document without proper citations.
In addition to the above, paying and/or exchanging gifts or services for someone else to complete your assignments or write your essays is also considered academic dishonesty. It is the philosophy of The University of Texas at Arlington that academic dishonesty is a completely unacceptable mode of conduct and will not be tolerated in any form. All persons involved in academic dishonesty will be disciplined in accordance with University regulations and procedures. Discipline may include suspension or expulsion from the University. As outlined in the Regents’ Rules and Regulations, “Scholastic dishonesty includes but is not limited to cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an examination for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts” (Series 50101, Section 2.2).
Plagiarism and Academic Honesty Lecture
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Plagiarism and Academic Honesty Lecture