Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Podcast # 2: Philosophy Bites Wikipedia has this to say about the podcast: page1image300459104undefinedpage1image300459376undefinedpage1image300459648undefinedpage1image300459984 series of 1520 minute interviews with philosophers on a particular topic
topic. Nigel is the host of the show, which has been running since 2007.
Philosophy Bites is a podcast about philosophy.
David Edmonds, a freelance lecturer, and Warburton…
The podcast has been a great success.
It is one of the top 20 most downloaded series in the United States, with over 34 million downloads.
page2image298647104undefinedpage2image298644816
1,000,000 downloads.
If you decide to pursue this topic, you should take the following steps:
The purpose of this essay is to inform your reader about the concept/topic/philosopher/problem discussed in the podcast, as well as to discuss your own interest in the topic.
Whatever topic you choose, your essay must include the following elements:
A heading formatted in MLA style.
A unique moniker
An introductory paragraph with your thesis (see this VERY helpful guide on how to write your intro/begin your essay, and if you’re not sure how to write a thesis, read this guide on developing a thesis)
Thesis-developing and-supporting body paragraphs (here is someexcellent advice on how to structure body paragraphs)
A minimum of three full pages are required (your works cited page does not count).
a final thought (Here’s some excellent advice on how to wrap up your essay)
A works cited page in MLA format that lists all sources used in your essay.
Your essay should be double-spaced and written in Times New Roman 12 point font; your paper should be written in Standard English and formatted according to MLA guidelines. To turn in your paper, go to the Unit 5 folder and click on Essay Assignment.’ Do not submit a pdf or type in the submission box; instead, attach a file that can be opened with Microsoft Word (doc or docx).
Choose a podcast episode that focuses on a topic that interests you.
Choose an episode from this thematically organized list of podcast episodes.
You may want to listen to a few episodes before writing about one.
deciding which one to use
Write an essay in which you summarize the podcast episode and explain why you’re interested in this topic.
Your essay must include a reference to/discussion of at least one reading from our text that relates to the topic of the podcast episode, as well as at least one reference to/discussion of an article/entry (also related to the podcast episode) in either The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy or The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, via quotation and/or citation.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Plato’s Cave Discussion: Finding Truth in a Post-Truth World |
Plato’s Cave Discussion: Finding Truth in a Post-Truth World