Police Are Changing Lineups to Avoid False IDs
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Police Are Changing Lineups to Avoid False IDs
Week 10 Discussion COLLAPSE Overall Rating:
To successfully complete this week’s discussion, you will need to:
Refer to Chapter 10 of your textbook.
Read the article, “Police Are Changing Lineups to Avoid False IDs.”
Please respond to the following in a substantive post.
Address these questions:
Do lineups still appear to be effective? Why or why not?
Is eyewitness identification still a proper investigation tool?
What point in the article drew your interest the most?
Be sure to provide full citations and references, formatted according to Strayer Writing Standards.
For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
Please respond substantively to at least one other post. Choose to respond to those who have few or no responses. If possible, choose the post of a classmate who holds a different viewpoint from yours about lineup effectiveness.
Consider questions such as these in your response:
What is something memorable in your classmate’s post that you want to remember?
In what ways, if at all, did your classmate’s post confirm or change your thinking about the effectiveness of lineups? How so?
What is one piece of information you would like your classmate to consider relating to lineup effectiveness?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow