Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Political Science Congress Discussion Essay
This is your unique response to congress!! Think like a political scientist!!
I need someone to write me a 400 word response discussing congress and members to congress.
How can candidates with diverse backgrounds (on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic class, religion, disability, age, other) be successful in getting elected to Congress – either from a Congressional district to the House of Representatives or from state-wide elections to the Senate? Think of current candidates running for Congress( Democrat and Republican candidates
Reflection Report: o A ‘reflection report’ based upon the UN Peacekeeping mission used for your Presentation o You must make references to at least 2 theories/authors of Conflict Management o Structure:
1) The conflict’s origins & peace process;
2) The Peacekeeping mission (origins/positives & negatives);
3) Observations and recommendations
Reflection Report:
o Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
o Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
o Text alignment: Justified.
o The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
o Wordcount: 1,500 words
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Political Science Congress Discussion Essay |
Political Science Congress Discussion Essay