positive or negative relationships
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Description / paper instructions
Create a network diagram – look at attached examples
e.g. discussing family structure or relationshipsDiscuss:
– what the data shows
– positive or negative relationships
– how you collected the data (must be your own data not from a published source)
– limitations of the studyPlease look at attached examples
Grading:
The assignment asks you to collect relational data. If you have not demonstrated evidence of this (i.e., that you collected your data, and that it is relational, i.e., a network) the maximum number of points you can get is 4, i.e., you lose 4 points.
You have to graph (produce a figure of) these data. This gets you 2 points. If you don’t know how to use software for this (which is 99% of the class), you draw by hand or use a drawing program.
You have to discuss these data using correct terminology on networks. This will give you 1 point.
You have to discuss the quality of your data (remember reliability & validity). This will give you 1 point.Identify a population of persons or things (nodes) connected by one or more relations (flows). Collect relational data on this population and graph the resulting social structure. Identify a structural feature of the population you have collected data on. Describe the nodes, the flow(s), and state why you selected this population. Evaluate the quality of your data. State what (if anything) you learned about this population from investigation of its structure. Be sure to represent your network as a graph, and be sure that you discuss an expectation with respect to your data, and then what you found, and what the limitations of your study might be. Max 3 pages, including figures/tables, references.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow positive or negative relationships
positive or negative relationships