Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Power in Social Work Practice Discussion Questions
3 discussion examples provided. (attached)
Post? a brief description of why it is important for social workers to be familiar with power dynamics when working with decision makers. In your description, address the following:
Identify the power resource you selected for use in your practice and advocacy.
Explain the resource you selected.
How does this power resource work to influence decision-makers?
Why is this power resource more appropriate for your approach to practice and advocacy than others?
Describe the ethical issues or concerns in using the type of power resource you selected.
Hi there, thanks in advance for your help. If you somehow have access to this source, it would help. otherwise I attached 3 discussion samples for this discussion assignment. Jansson, B. S. (2018).? Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Chapter 10, “Developing and Using Power in the Policy-Enacting Task” (pp. 328–371)
Power in Social Work Practice Discussion Questions
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Power in Social Work Practice Discussion Questions |
Power in Social Work Practice Discussion Questions