Preserving Arable Land: Addressing Depletion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Preserving Arable Land: Addressing Depletion
Arable land Land that is appropriate for plowing and growing crops is considered to be arable land. The term is used to refer to the land that is currently under cultivation, and the land has the potential to be cultivated. It encompasses land that is of soil and climate suitable for agricultural purposes. The land also has to be protected by the right regime of policies, regulations, and acts of parliament. How Human Influence Has Affected Arable Land Human beings are responsible for the increasing rate of the scarcity of arable land. The increase in human population has led to the occupation of formerly arable land thereby reducing the land that can be put under agriculture (Zabel, Putzenlechner, & Mauser, 2014). Industries established by man have not only taken up the land suitable for agriculture but have also populated the environment and caused global warming that makes the current global climate unsuitable for agriculture. Deforestation, urbanization, and poor cultivation methods are other human activities that have led to a decrease in the global size of arable land. Increased human population has created pressure on the available arable as the land is overexploited to meet human demands. Solution to The Problem Due to the availability of new technologies, more land can be made suitable for agriculture. Individual governments can reclaim more land from the seas and oceans while the dry areas can be made suitable through the use of irrigation (Lanz, Dietz, & Swanson, 2017). The existing arable land should also be conserved using laws and programs that are focused on solving or alleviating the human pressure that leads to their depletion. Whether International Agreement Is A Suitable Method of Solving the Problem Some of the factors that are causing the depletion of arable land such as climate change are global and therefore require a global measure. Having an international agreement will only be effective if individual countries, especially the more powerful countries commit to it. Further, without an effective enforcement mechanism, an international agreement will not be effective. The increasing reduction of arable land should be a concern to all nations, and more proactive measures should be adopted instead of relying on the current reactive measures that are not effective. References Lanz, B., Dietz, S., & Swanson, T. (2017). Global economic growth and agricultural land conversion under uncertain productivity improvements in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(2), 545–569. Zabel, F., Putzenlechner, B., & Mauser, W. (2014). Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High-Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e107522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107522
Preserving Arable Land: Addressing Depletion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose are provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |