Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Personal Ethics Discussion
Provide a substantive, detailed response.
Some thoughts to consider –
Would this violate your own personal ethics?
How would your family and community react if your actions were known?
How would your actions look in the newspaper?
Discussion – Visit the website Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, 2009-2017: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/ explore the various sections and look around the site.
From the Projects link; review and scan the report: Ethics and Ebola: Public Health Planning and Response [https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/4637.html]
What are your thoughts on these questions asked above and some thoughts on a scan of the Ethics and Ebola Report?
Give an example and explain what you would do in a healthcare situation. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
249
Analyze And Apply Critical Thinking Skills In The Psychopathology
Head to Toe Examination Discussion
Goal: To analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying evidence-based research.
Chapter 5, Case 2 | Helen is a 45-year-old African American female who separated two months ago from her husband of 25 years after he had an extramarital affair. In addition to running the household and managing 18-year-old fraternal twins, she works part-time at a local dry cleaning business. Helen started experiencing increased anxiety, lack of ability to fall asleep, and daytime tiredness over the last three months. The symptoms have progressed over the last four weeks to increasing sadness, inappropriate guilt, poor appetite, and decreased energy levels. Helen is struggling to maintain her usual activities and is starting to feel that “life is not worth living,” but she has not had any suicide ideation per se. Helen has no personal or family history of psychiatric illness. She uses alcohol once or twice a month but not to excess. Helen’s medical history is significant for lower-extremity neuropathy of unknown origin. |
Questions: | Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and clinical guidelines to create your evidence-based treatment plan. At all times, explain your answers.
YOUR RESPONSE MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FOUND IN YOUR TEXTBOOK. Summarize the clinical case. What is the DSM5 diagnosis? Identify the rationale for your diagnosis using the DSM5 diagnostic criteria. According to the clinical guidelines, which one pharmacological treatment is most appropriate to prescribe? Include the medication name, dose, frequency and rationale for this treatment. According to the clinical guidelines, which one non-pharmacological treatment would you prescribe? (exclude psychotherapy modalities) Include the risk and benefits of the chosen rationale for this treatment. Include an assessment of medication’s appropriateness, cost, effectiveness, safety, and potential for patient adherence. Use a local pharmacy to research the cost of the medication. Use great detail when answering questions 3-5. |
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|