Privilege and Populism with Drugs Substances essay

Privilege and Populism with Drugs Substances

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Privilege and Populism with Drugs Substances

For this activity, read the article, “Prohibition, Privilege and the Drug Apartheid: The Failure of Drug Policy Reform to Address the Underlying Fallacies of Drug Prohibition” and type answers to the following five essay questions in the available spaces. Due Sunday April 18th before 11pm
The questions to prepare your answers for are as follows:
1) What does the author mean by the term “drug apartheid” (do not simply copy/past the definition – explain fully in your own words)?
2) In general, how does this article relate to or demonstrate evaluation research?
3) In general, how does this article relate to or demonstrate comparative research?
4) In your own words, summarize the authors’ main argument(s).
5) How do you personally feel about the authors’ main argument(s), and how do they compare to what you have previously learned/believe about drugs and drug prohibition?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Privilege and Populism with Drugs Substances

Privilege and Populism with Drugs Substances

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!