PRM 1006 RFP Requesting Proposal for HSN Implementation of EMR System

July 10, 2021

RFP Requesting Proposal for HSN Implementation of EMR System

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

RFP Requesting Proposal for HSN Implementation of EMR System

Theme of the Project

Your team is working on the HSN EMR project, and you’ve seen that you’ll need to buy a few things and/or do a few things.

Details for Assignment 2

Produce and submit a document or documents that include the following information in the order listed.

1.Each file must begin with a list of each team member’s names (names 1, 2, 3, and 4) for marking purposes.

2.Write a Simplified RFP for equipment (hardware or software) and/or activities, soliciting offers from sellers (like hiring an IT technician for installation). Remember that the equipment purchase must be significant enough to merit the RFP (competitive bidding) procedure.

3.Include a description of how you envision transitioning to digital EMRs, with a focus on details relating to timing and scheduling, or that could be utilized to reason through time management processes.

4.Make a numbered list of any and all assumptions.

5.Complete a Source Selection Criteria table with at least three (3) criteria and include it in your RFP. What criteria will you use to choose qualified sellers? What do you want to get the most out of when it comes to narrowing down the list of sellers who can reply to your RFP?

Only consider these specific results in relation to the topic objective for this assignment. As placeholder inputs, you can utilize the output of other processes from other classes, or you can use your collective imagination. Only your capacity to think through and apply these time management processes is being assessed.

RFP Requesting Proposal for HSN Implementation of EMR System

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met