Problem-solving Model Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Problem-solving Model Study Assignment
Introduction for Final Paper & Problem Statement Draft
Introduction for Final Paper & Problem Statement Draft Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Thoroughly explained what business-related problem was chosen for the final paper and the reason why. 50 / 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Included problem-statement draft with the required four elements. 0 / 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar/Spelling/Grammatical Please note that .5 points are deducted for each error to a maximum of 10 points.
10 / 10.0 pts Total Points: 60 Lecture
Problem-solving Model
Last week, you started working on step one of the problem-solving model (identifying the problem). You began this by starting to analyze the problem (step two).
The next step is to write a problem statement that clarifies the problem. Further, once you analyze the problem, be sure to identify the problem (not just the symptom).
Analyzing a Problem
When analyzing a problem, it is critical to gather as much information as possible. This will help you to determine what the problem is.
To start analyzing a problem, it is best to begin by talking to those who are aware of the problem (stakeholders) and/or others who might be able to shed some light on the problem. As such, begin by talking to your co-workers and/or boss. As a side note, do not rely on your boss for the answer. Quite often, those who are directly affected by the issue will provide more information. Also, be aware of people stating opinions and not stating facts. For example, “We are behind with accounts payable because there is not enough time during the day to do our jobs!” This might be true, but if most people that you talk to do not state the same opinion, then more information is needed.
When talking to people, ask questions that will help you to clarify the problem. If this is an internal problem (i.e., accounts payable is behind, people are often late to work), then there is no need to conduct external research.
However, if it is not evident that this is an internal problem, it could be that this is an external problem. For example, if sales are down, conduct research to determine if sales are also down in the industry. An easy way to do this is using the Internet – Google is a great source to use!
Understanding how to analyze a problem will help you with one of this week’s discussion topics. In addition, it will aid you when completing the final project.
Problem Statement
After you realize what the actual problem is, it is best to write a problem statement. This is necessary if you are trying to convince other people that there is a problem. If you are not involving others, a problem statement is still valuable for reminding you of what the problem is.
There are different ways to write a problem statement. Please refer to the resources in this week’s overview.
That said, be sure to include the following:
- Ideal situation – What is the goal? For example, invoices from vendors should be paid within 30 days.
- Summarize the problem – Provide a brief explanation of the problem. For example, invoices are being paid beyond the 30-day requirement.
- Symptoms – What are the symptoms of the problem? Vendors are complaining!
- Consequences – What will happen if the problem is not solved? Explain how the problem not being resolved will impact the company. For example, if invoices are not paid on time, it is possible that vendors will not renew their contracts.
Understanding how to write a problem statement will help you with this week’s assignment.
Symptoms versus Problems
There is often confusion between symptoms and the actual problem. Symptoms are what make a person aware that there is a problem. However, the symptom(s) might not indicate the true problem. In fact, there might be more than one symptom!
For example, Company XYZ is behind with shipping out orders. Sure, this is an issue, but it might be a symptom. After checking into the problem, you find out that the department is short staffed. After further investigation, you find out that the manager left and as he was well liked, so employees left. That might be the end of it, but you might want to investigate further. For example, why did the manager leave?
Understanding the differences between symptoms and problems will help you with this week’s discussion. In addition, it will help you to determine the true problem for your final paper.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Problem-solving Model Study Assignment