Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Process Indicator and Outcome Indicator Discussion
Please share a process indicator and an outcome indicator. It can be one of yours or it can be a random one from somewhere else.
For each indicator, please assess using SMART criteria (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-oriented).
Your initial post is due by Thursday of Week 7 at 11:59 pm.
By Saturday of Week 7 at 11:59 pm, you need to respond to at least two classmates on their posts. Respond in one or more of the following ways:
Expand on the colleague’s posting with additional insight and resources.
Offer polite disagreement or critique, supported with evidence.
Compare and contrast their key points with yours.
———
Assignment 2 :
This seventh and final component of your final project has two (2) parts:
Describe your evaluation plan in 1-2 pages (double spaced) and include the following criteria:
What are the purposes of the evaluation (at least two)?
Who will use the evaluation results?
How will they use the evaluation results (at least two)?
What do other key stakeholders need from the evaluation?
** You may wish to refer to Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide (CDC, 2011, p. 45-46) in the Module 7 readings.
Create a one-page table of at least three process indicators and at least three outcome indicators, along with each of their data collection methods/sources.
** You may wish to refer to Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide (CDC, 2011, Table 4.3, p. 64) in the Module 7 readings.
First post :
Process indicator:
Through discussion sessions, the percentage of physical activity for older women, participating in the awareness conference, to be increased for at least 10 minutes daily, within a week since the launch of the conference.
I set the indicator upon the SMART Goals guideline. It is specific because it is targeted the senior women who will join the conference. And it is measurable, based on the selected measured time which is 10 minutes per day. Due to the limited time set on a daily basis, it made it attainable. It is actually relevant because the goal of my programs is to improve bone health, and physical activity is one of the prevention methods. Lastly, Determining the measurement in a week makes it time-based.
Outcome indicator:
After the conference ended, the percentage of physical activity for the senior participants in the awareness conference was raised to 20 minutes per day, for at least two weeks, and to ensure their full conviction of the importance of this activity for their physical health.
Specific: Senior women who joined the conference.
Measurable: 20 minutes per day.
Attainable: Fairly easy and achievable.
Relevant: Related to the main objective of the program.
Time-based: At the conference completion.
——
Post 2:
The program process indicator consists of activities or outputs on logical models such as products and deliverables of the activities. The measures of the activities and outputs show that the program is implemented effectively.
Process Indicator: Mental Health
Mental health counseling program aims at reducing gender-based violence among married couple. Couples married between 2-10 years attended the counseling program facing different issues due to the pandemic. It aims at reducing gender-based violence caused by mental illness and stability by 10% in approximately 5 to 6 months of participation within the program.
SMART Criteria
S-Specific
Married couples married for 2-10 years attended the counseling program.
M-Measurable
Reduction of gender-based violence among couples by 10%.
A-Achievable
Development of educational programs and resources.
R-Relevant
Realistic and attainable lifestyle quality change among married couples.
T-Time Oriented
Approximately 5 to 6 months of participation in the program.
Outcome Indicator
Outcome indicators symbolize short, intermediate, and long-term outcomes within a logical model.
Outcome Indicator: Increase mental stability
In conclusion, the program facilitates stable mental health of husbands and wives who believe that there is a correlation between mental health and gender-based violence. Hence 5% response to the effectiveness of the program.
SMART Criteria
S-Specific
Husbands and wives that attend the mental counseling program.
M-Measurable
5% increase response to the effectiveness of the program.
A-Achievable
Mental health stability.
R-Relevant
Developing the correlation between mental health and gender-based violence.
T-Time-Oriented
Conclusion of the counseling program.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Process Indicator and Outcome Indicator Discussion |
Process Indicator and Outcome Indicator Discussion