Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Production of The Pretty Discussion
Description and Rationale:
As we have discussed, Rosalind Galt proposes that the production of the pretty as a space of rhetorical exclusion depends heavily on its connection to the wrong kinds of bodies (Galt 2011, 20). Being connected to the wrong kinds of bodies, the pretty image necessarily becomes a troublesome image that is always connected to the critique of gender, sexuality, raceand, I would add, class.
In this essay, you will explain Galts argument, using the two films Kbela and Madame Satã as examples / evidence. Through the films, you will address how pretty can be part of the decolonial methods of resistance to the colonization that dehumanized most of the people in the world, as Lugones has described (Lugones 2017, 43). You will use the films in the way you find more pertinent to express your understanding and position about Galt’s theory.
This is a short essay, in which your focus will be (1) clarity, (2) convincing use of evidence, and (3) conciseness. The challenge is to produce a text that conveys complex ideas in a non-academic language. Think of your reader as an interested non-specialist, non-academic: for example, reader of a magazine or newspaper.
Length: 1000 words
Formatting: Times New Roman. 12 pt. Double Space. MLA for citations and quotes.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Production of The Pretty Discussion |
Production of The Pretty Discussion