Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Professional assignment of written communication
Details of assignment
We live in the Information Age, where knowledge, facts and opinions of others are available. This might be handy especially when you need information to decideespecially a product or service decision.
Think of a product or service you can buy or use in the near future. For example, you might choose a domestic everyday product; a big purchase such as an appliance or automobile; a book that you saw published; services such as a restaurant, physician or pet groomer; or a basic smartphone app.
Locate 2 sources of information on the product or service you have chosen to help you make a purchase choice. Assess each source by replying to the following questions:
Describe the product or service and why you intend to buy or use it.
List the title, author, date and place for each source (and the Web site, if applicable).
Describe how every source helps you to decide if the goods or service should be purchased.
Do you believe the source to be credible as the audience? Why not? Why or why not?
Send your completed assignment under Unit 2 Evaluation of Information Sources by uploading a question and answer MS Word Document and typing your responses to questions directly into the assignment field. You can utilize the optional Unit 2 Individual project template, which already includes the questions stated above, to support your assignment request.
Are you looking for an example?
Examine an example of what your project unit 2 should look like:
Example of Unit 2 with Template Unit 2 Individual Project Example Without Template
Tips to complete this task
Consider some sites where you can search for sources of your product:
Additional reviews of that product or service
Articles rating different goods or services in the same category (e.g. “Best 10 SUVs of the Year!” or “Chicago Top Dog Groomers”)
Articles discussing the need or advantage of the product in general (e.g., “Ways to Save Money on Gear for a New Baby”)
Put yourself in the shoes of the consumer if the source is helpful (i.e., the audience). Does learning where the source comes from give your point of view greater weight?
Think about the confidence of the authors of your sources. From where did your information come? Do you think these are reputable sources of information on this product? Why not? Why or why not?
Materials for reading and learning
Use the following resources to complete this task:
Where are shoppers looking for products? Bump by Pamela
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results