Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Project Management Discussion Essay Assignment
You have been assigned as the project manager of a critical project for your firm.
Your firm has been hired by a large federal agency to develop an application that is accessible by Apple and Android-based tablets that provides near real-time updates regarding the status of the agency to reduce crime in three high-profile metro areas.
Since this project is so critical, you have been asked to complete this project in 90 days.
You are very familiar with developing traditional project charters/statements of work. Since you will be using an Agile approach for your application, you know you need to have a different charter.
Identify and discuss a key challenge for you in moving away from a waterfall-like project charter to one that is Agile-like. Justify your response.
After posting your response, respond to at least one of your classmates’ suggestions.
Please respond to studen’t comment below:
As the project manager for my firm, which has recently been hired to develop an application which is accessible by Apple and Android based tablets, in near real time updates.
Since we are already familiar with the developing traditional project charters and statements of work, I would start by suggesting a very comprehensive look at a waterfall-like project, the pros and cons, accessibilities and challenges for this project.
Then make the same assessment for the Agile-like project and provide a clear Agile approach for my Agile project.
Since this project duration will be for a period of 90 days, and a new project charter is issued by senior management, Challenges towards meeting the goal of this new charter, moving from waterfall like project to an Agile-like project.
For this Agile project I would say that communication and managing project meetings and subsequent meetings to achieve the target gold of 90 days would be my key challenges.
Since there would be different team members with different skill sets and perhaps locations, I would think this would be one of my key challenges for this project
In justifying my response, there are other challenges of breaking away from waterfall-like project to an Agile-like project would certainly encounter challenges to my Agile approach But, the end-result would most likely be a successful project that would have its deliverables on-time and on budget.
An important thing to remember is that by using the Agile approach at the end of each iteration, both the stakeholders and customers conduct a review to evaluate progress of the project making sure everything meets their objectives and goals.
It also allows for flexible scope, embrace changes and the customer interaction throughout the project.
Unlike the traditional waterfall-like projects, where many other things such as designs must be completed upfront, having a fixed scope instead of a flexible, and minimum customer interaction.
Project Management Discussion Essay Assignment
Project Management Discussion Essay Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Project Management Discussion Essay Assignment |
Project Management Discussion Essay Assignment