Project Management
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Project Management
As noted in the case study, Samantha believes that project management methodologies and tools such as estimating techniques, planning tools, PM software, risk assessments, and communication plans would largely solve the issues that Global Green Books is facing. Based on what you have learned so far in this course, how do you believe that these practices will help the company overcome its current challenges? If you were hired as a project manager for Global Green Books, are there any other practices that you would recommend in addition to what Samantha suggests, and how could they be effective? Please support your recommendations with academic and professional resources and the textbook.
Your initial thread to this post should be 400 – 500 words long and include at least two recent (in the last five years) academic and/or professional references in addition to the textbook. Please also reply to two peers. Replies should be a minimum of 200 words and include a minimum of one recent scholarly citation in addition to the textbook to support your thoughts and ideas. Please use APA formatting for headings, in-text citations, and references. You do not need to include a title page or abstract.
Project Management
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |