Proposal ethical considerations
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Proposal ethical considerations
Ethical considerations are an important aspect of any proposal, as they address the potential impact of the proposed project or program on individuals, communities, and society as a whole.
One key ethical consideration is the potential for harm. This includes both physical harm, such as injury or illness, and psychological harm, such as stress or trauma. For example, a proposal for a medical research study should consider the potential risks to study participants, and take steps to minimize those risks.
Another important ethical consideration is informed consent. This refers to the process of ensuring that individuals understand the nature of the project or program and any potential risks, and voluntarily agree to participate. Informed consent is particularly important when working with vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with mental or physical disabilities.
Privacy and confidentiality are also important ethical considerations. In many cases, proposals will involve collecting and/or sharing personal information about individuals or groups. It is important to ensure that this information is collected and used in a way that respects privacy and keeps the information confidential. This may involve obtaining consent from individuals, implementing security measures to protect the information, and adhering to laws and regulations related to privacy and confidentiality.
Another ethical consideration is potential bias in the design and implementation of the project or program. This could include bias in the selection of participants, in the way data is collected or analyzed, or in the interpretation of results. It is important to be aware of potential sources of bias, and take steps to minimize it where possible.
Finally, there are ethical considerations related to the distribution of benefits and harms. For example, a proposal for a new development project in a low-income community may bring economic benefits to the area, but could also displace long-time residents or damage the environment. It is important to consider these potential harms and to work to minimize them, while also striving to ensure that the benefits of the project are distributed fairly.
Overall, ethical considerations are an essential part of any proposal, as they help to ensure that the project or program is implemented in a responsible, fair, and respectful way. It is important to anticipate and address potential ethical issues early on in the proposal process, to ensure that the project or program is implemented in a way that is consistent with the values of the community and society as a whole.
Proposal ethical considerations
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow