Proposal experimental design

Proposal experimental design

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Proposal experimental design

An experimental design is a plan for conducting a scientific study. It outlines the methods and procedures that will be used to collect and analyze data, and is an essential component of any research project. The following is a proposal for an experimental design that can be used to study a specific research question or hypothesis.

The first step in designing an experiment is to clearly define the research question or hypothesis. This should be a clear and concise statement that describes what the study aims to investigate. For example, the research question could be: “Does a new drug reduce symptoms of depression in patients with major depressive disorder?”

Once the research question has been defined, the next step is to identify the population of interest. This can be a specific group of individuals or a certain type of organism. In this example, the population of interest would be individuals with major depressive disorder.

Next, the sample size and sampling technique should be determined. The sample size is the number of individuals or organisms that will be included in the study, and the sampling technique is the method used to select the sample. For example, the sample size could be 100 individuals with major depressive disorder, and the sampling technique could be random sampling.

The experimental design should also include a description of the intervention or treatment that will be used. In this example, the intervention would be the new drug that is being tested. The control group, which is used as a comparison group, should also be defined. This group may receive a placebo or a standard treatment.

The outcome measures should also be defined. These are the variables that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the treatment. In this example, the outcome measures could include the severity of depression symptoms as measured by a standardized scale.

Data collection and analysis methods should also be outlined in the experimental design. The methods used to collect data should be reliable and valid, and the methods used to analyze data should be appropriate for the research question.

Finally, the experimental design should include a discussion of potential limitations and sources of bias. This can include factors such as the sample size, the sampling technique, and the intervention or treatment used.

In conclusion, an experimental design is an essential component of any scientific study. It outlines the methods and procedures that will be used to collect and analyze data, and helps ensure that the study is conducted in a rigorous and controlled manner. A well-designed experiment can provide valuable insights into the research question or hypothesis, and can contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

Proposal experimental design

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!