Proposal limitations and challenges
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Proposal limitations and challenges
- Respect for human rights: The proposal should not involve any actions that would violate the rights of individuals or groups. This includes issues such as discrimination, exploitation, or harm to vulnerable populations.
- Fairness and justice: The proposal should be designed to be fair and just for all stakeholders. This includes ensuring that any benefits or harms are distributed equitably, and that the rights and interests of marginalized groups are protected.
- Transparency and accountability: The proposal should be transparent about its goals, methods, and expected outcomes, and should include mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating progress. This will help to ensure that the project is accountable to all stakeholders.
- Environmental sustainability: The proposal should take into account the potential environmental impacts of the project, and should be designed to minimize any negative effects.
- Cultural sensitivity: The proposal should be sensitive to the cultural context in which it will be implemented, and should respect the traditions and values of the local population.
- Socio-economic impact: The proposal should consider the socio-economic impact of the project, and should be designed to promote social and economic development in a sustainable way.
- Transparency: the proposal should be clear on the process and methods of decision making, the stakeholders involved, and the data and evidence used to support the proposal.
- Confidentiality: the proposal should be aware of the need to protect sensitive information and the rights of individuals to privacy.
- Responsiveness: the proposal should be responsive to the needs and concerns of stakeholders, and should be willing to make changes as needed in order to address any issues that arise.
- Long-term impact: the proposal should consider the long-term impact of the project, and should be designed to promote sustainable development that will benefit future generations.
By considering these ethical considerations, you can ensure that your proposal is responsible, fair, and sustainable, and that it will have a positive impact on all stakeholders. However, it is important to remember that ethical considerations are often complex and context-specific, so it is important to seek input from a wide range of stakeholders and experts to ensure that all relevant issues are taken into account.
Proposal limitations and challenges
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow