Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
For the case study, use the following template:
– APA style
– Use the third person to write.
– Do not inquire about anything.
– Text containing quotes necessitates the use of a page or paragraph number in the citation.
– SafeAssign will be used to check all papers. Please try to keep the SafeAssign percentage around 20%.
Introduction
The introduction provides a quick summary of your note.
The CIO has asked you to read Connelly (2016) and consider what resources you’ll need to set up your new information system. Please also go over the five case studies in (Basu 2015, pp. 32-35) so you may suggest a change management style for your firm.
Implementation of Recommendations
What percentage of the implementation work can you handle? What additional resources (people, information, time, money, etc.) can you bring to the table to speed up the process and avoid ending up like Susie Jeffer?
To get a A’ in this section, you must do the following:
Described professional advantages and disadvantages
Figure 1: If applicable, include a source (include diagram)
Risks and Scope Creep in Projects
Identified project risks and scope creep, and provided guidance on how to avoid both.
Figure 2 (include diagram/chart) Include a source if relevant.
Strategy for Managing Change
Create a change management strategy that includes the following steps:
What new hardware and software are required?
What kind of training and assistance will the employees require? During the changeover time, how will the workers fulfill their tasks?
Are there any additional areas where you expect resistance?
The necessity for new hardware and software was explained.
Staff training is being proposed.
Described how employees will continue to work during the transition.
Areas of Resistance Expected
Business needs are linked to the need for change management.
Staff training on strategy execution is organized into a structure.
Recommendations for dealing with resistance
Feasibility Evidence
Because the CIO is doubtful, provide proof that your judgment is correct and complete. Accepting personal limitations can be challenging.
Alternative assessments have been evaluated.
Explained why alternative assessments aren’t as accurate or thorough as traditional ones.
Evidence confirming the assessment is accurate and thorough has been provided.
I proposed a method for overcoming personal and team restrictions.
Considerations that would be of interest to other members of the C-suite were proposed.
References
ADDING NAME
[JM3] [RSK1] [RSK2]
from:Address
ADD THE DATE
ADD a title to the subject
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Proposed Information Project Implementation |
Proposed Information Project Implementation