Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PSY621 Discussion Paper on Insanity Defense
Discuss the following in 1500 words:
1. Recognize the various types of insanity defenses.
2. Identify the most typical state-level insanity defense.
3. Count how many times the insanity defense was presented.
4. Discuss how a criminal defendant’s insanity is determined.
5. Explain how a psychologist might be used as an expert witness to prove or refute an insanity defense.
To back up your arguments, use three to five scholarly sources.
Prepare this work in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which may be found in the Student Success Center. It is not necessary to submit an abstract.
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for a successful completion.
1. Read Contemporary Criminal Law, Chapters 8 and 9.
URL:
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/sage/2018/contemporary-criminal-law concepts-cases-and-controversies 5e.php
2. Read Penrod and Cutler’s “Witness Confidence and Witness Accuracy: Assessing Their Forensic Relationship” in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (1995).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1996-13285-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3.Use the material from the website to help you complete the assignment for this topic. Keep in mind that procedures may differ slightly from one state to the next.
URL:
http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Public/Pamphlets/Arrested.aspx
4. To help with this topic’s assignment, go to the website of the United States Attorneys’ Offices.
URL:
https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/investigation
5..Read Cutler, Dexter, and Penrod’s “Expert Testimony and Jury Decision Making: An Empirical Analysis” in Behavioral Sciences & The Law (1989).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=20626900&site=ehost-live&scope=site
6. Read Leippe’s article “The Case for Expert Witness Testimony About Eyewitness Memory” in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (1995).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1996-13282-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
7. Read Gowensmith, Murrie, and Boccaccini’s article “How Reliable are Forensic Evaluations of Legal Sanity?” in Law & Human Behavior (American Psychological Association) (2013).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=89366057&site=ehost-live&scope=site
8. Read Dror, McCormack, and Epstein’s article “Cognitive Bias and Its Impact on Expert Witnesses and the Court” in Judges’ Journal (2015).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=114546671&site=ehost-live&scope=site
9. From Brodsky’s Testifying in Court: Guidelines and Maxims for the Expert Witness, see “Psychotherapists as Expert Witnesses.” The American Psychological Association (APA) is a professional organization dedicated to (2013).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2012-19379-038&site=ehost-live&scope=site
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
PSY621 Discussion Paper on Insanity Defense