Public Health Discussion Case Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Public Health Discussion Case Assignment
For this discussion, you will analyze a case study in public health from the textbook, Master of Public Health Competencies: A Case Study Approach.
Please review the following case study from this text: Chapter 11: Evaluating a Multi-Site Campus-Based Sexual Assault Prevention Intervention
This case study was based on real public health initiatives; therefore, your engagement in this discussion will help you hone workforce-related skills for public health practice.
For your initial post, please address all of the following questions:
Appraisal of Evaluation Methodologies Formative Evaluation: What would need to be measured before implementation to ensure this public health effort is feasible, appropriate, or acceptable?
How would you gather this information?
Summative Evaluation: Why would it be important to address summative evaluation (the degree to which actual changes occurred as a result of the program) as opposed to limiting assessment to process evaluation?
What would you measure with summative evaluation?
Process Evaluation: Why might policymakers and funders be more concerned with summative evaluation outcomes than with process-based outcomes?
How does this change your approach to process evaluation?
What would you measure with process evaluation?
Outcome Evaluation: What types of outcomes might have more value in health promotion as well as in reducing the burden of sexual assault and intimate-partner violence in a large, urban, commuter university setting?
What would you measure with outcome evaluation?
Impact Evaluation: How does impact evaluation inform the management of the intervention? What would you measure with impact evaluation?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Public Health Discussion Case Assignment
Public Health Discussion Case Assignment