Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Punishment and Rehabilitation of Criminals
Presentation Outline
I. Introduction
A. Moral obligation is a dusty which we ought to perform but is not legally binding.
B. All states and countries offer laws and regulations that punish the criminals according to the weigh of their crimes and those with major crimes get a death penalty (Ladd, 2017).
C. The issue of punishment is an ethical issue which can be analyzed well using the utilitarianism ethical theory.
II. We have a moral obligation towards punishing and rehabilitating criminals
A. Crimes are harmful and constitute moral wrong doings such as dishonestly, theft, murder and that gives has a moral obligation to rehabilitate and punish criminals.
B. We have a moral obligation towards each other and protecting each others welfare.
C. Punishment and rehabilitation helps criminals reform and we have a duty towards the community to help reform bad behavior (Haji, 2021).
III. We have no moral obligation towards punishing and rehabilitating criminals.
A. Punishing and rehabilitating criminals is legal, but what moral obligations does one have towards this? (Kolber, 2018)
B. We have a moral obligation to obey the set laws and regulations and respecting authorities but have no moral obligation for the punishment and rehabilitation of criminals (Chiao, 2018).
IV. Decision: We have a moral obligation to punish and rehabilitate criminals.
A. According to the utilitarian approach actions are immoral if they cause harm and vice versa.
B. The harm that is caused by crimes needs to be eliminated or reduced (Canton, 2017).
C. Correctional facilities and rehabilitation help eliminate threat of future harm.
V. Conclusion
If actions harm others then we have a moral duty to help eliminate these actions and make our communities and societies better.
VI. Relevant Questions
1. Do we have a moral duty to report crimes which result into no harm? If yes, why?
2. Do the police have any moral obligation towards maintaining the safety of the people?
3. What are the moral obligations of communities towards criminals, if there is any?
References
Canton, R. (2017). Why Punish?: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Punishment. Macmillan
International Higher Education.
Chiao, V. (2018). Criminal law in the age of the administrative state. Oxford University Press.
Haji, I. (2021). Obligation Incompatibilism and Blameworthiness. Philosophical Papers, 1-23.
Kolber, A. J. (2018). Punishment and moral risk. U. Ill. L. Rev., 487.
Ladd, J. (2017). Legal and moral obligation. In Political and Legal Obligation (pp. 3-35).
Routledge.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Punishment and Rehabilitation of Criminals 2