Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Quality Health Care Outcomes Paper
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
· Quality Health Care Outcomes Assignment
Please upload your assignment here.
· Instructions
Instructions for Quality Health care Outcomes Paper as PDF
Many provisions of the ACA promote Higher Value Care or value-based reimbursement. An example of these are the Medicare Shared Savings Programs. Within this type of value-based reimbursement, several programs including the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP). Choose one of these value-based programs for your paper.
LINKS
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/HAC-Reduction-Program
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HRRP/Hospital-Readmission-Reduction-Program
https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview
Paper Components and Formatting Guidelines
Formatting and Style: Papers should be submitted as one document, 11-point Arial font, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced. Submitted papers should be free of spelling or grammar errors, and the paper should be written in traditional academic APA format.
1. Title Page: Traditional APA format, all pages numbered. Student Name (with any credentials), Institutional affiliation, Country, Email Address, Date, Course Name
1. The Body of the Paper should be no more than 5 pages double spaced (not including title page). Use the following required Level 1 Headings of (centered, boldface, uppercase and lowercase headings), but feel free to correctly use Level 2 Headings (and Level 3, if necessary).
1. You may include information in a table format or figure if that is helpful to you. If used, reference in the body of the paper but insert after the final reference page.
3. Overview of (either MIPS, HRRP, or HACRP)
1. Provide an overview of the program selected.
3. How (MIPS, HRRP, or HACRP) Intends to Achieve Higher Value
2. Explain broadly how this program was intended to achieve higher value
3. History and Evidence
3. Discuss how the mechanism specifically works.
3. Synthesize the history and evidence that shows — when implemented — the policy has achieved higher value, improves quality outcomes, and decreases costs (e.g., Is it working? Where? Outcomes?)
3. Fit between (MIPS, HRRP, or HACRP) and Evidence-based Nursing
4. Give an example of how evidence-based practice in nursing could fit into the program you selected. For instance, what evidence-based nursing action/ intervention(s) help to reduce infections (or improve quality measure x), which is an intended outcome of (selected program).” Be specific.
3. Recommendations and the Role of Nursing
5. Make 3 recommendations on how this payment mechanism could be improved or work better in your opinion. Consider nurses and nursing and the role they could play in these recommendations.
3. References: References should be included in APA format with a minimum of 3 primary references (peer-reviewed journal articles) published within the past 5 years. All references MUST appear in the body of the paper if they are in the reference list follow APA guidelines carefully.
3. Figure or Table, if you choose to add one; labeled correctly and referenced in the body of the table correctly.
Grading Rubric for Assignment 2: Quality Health Care Assignment
Total Points: 100
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: Assignment 2: Quality Health Care Assignment
· Grid View
· List View
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Quality Health Care Outcomes Paper