Quality Improvement in Healthcare Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Quality Improvement in Healthcare Paper
OVERVIEW
Using your research and Outline, you will work on the Draft of the 3000–5,000-word paper,
complying with the instructions below.
INSTRUCTIONS
Format
? 3,000–5,000 words, double-spaced, not including title and reference pages
? Times New Roman, 12-point font
? Left justified
? One-inch margins
? Current APA format
? Numbered pages
? At least 20 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, no more than 10 years old
? Block quotations for any quotes more than 40 words:
? Reference page in current APA format including active URL links
? Single spacing between references and double spacing within the reference
Content
? A title page that includes:
o “Running head:” and page number (right aligned)
o Course number and name
o Case name
o Date submitted
o “Respectfully submitted to: (Instructor’s Name)”
? Abstract (in block format)
? Content of your topic and/or paper (review the associated grading rubric)
o Use concepts from the textbook that are related to your topic, including page
numbers where the concepts may be found. Credit will only be earned for
concepts supported by page numbers from the textbook. (Essentially, this is
accomplished through integration of the relevant course content, using properly
formatted, current APA citations.)
o Use in-text citations in current APA format to credit sources listed in the
reference list as appropriate.
? Conclusion
? ReferencesQuality Improvement in Healthcare Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow