Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment

July 22, 2021

Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment

PAGE 1: While the Direct Practice Improvement project’s purpose is to achieve clinical significance, you’ll also need to consider whether the data analysis has statistical significance. Statistical significance (p.05) aids in determining whether a result is the result of luck or chance. How will you justify clinical significance if your DPI experiment does not achieve statistical significance?

Review the forms of data that are deemed protected health information on page two (PHI). What impact will the collection of this data have on your project (whether you plan to collect it or not), and how would you keep it to preserve the information you’re gathering?

3rd page Choose a nursing journal where you’d like to publish your DPI project once it’s completed. Include an overview of the author guidelines and the journal’s name. Describe at least two additional techniques that writers utilize to distribute or communicate study findings. How can the author guidelines, as well as the other techniques you’ve discovered, help you plan and implement your DPI project? How might the author guidelines help you in your practice?

3 page minimum requirement

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met