Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment
PAGE 1: While the Direct Practice Improvement project’s purpose is to achieve clinical significance, you’ll also need to consider whether the data analysis has statistical significance. Statistical significance (p.05) aids in determining whether a result is the result of luck or chance. How will you justify clinical significance if your DPI experiment does not achieve statistical significance?
Review the forms of data that are deemed protected health information on page two (PHI). What impact will the collection of this data have on your project (whether you plan to collect it or not), and how would you keep it to preserve the information you’re gathering?
3rd page Choose a nursing journal where you’d like to publish your DPI project once it’s completed. Include an overview of the author guidelines and the journal’s name. Describe at least two additional techniques that writers utilize to distribute or communicate study findings. How can the author guidelines, as well as the other techniques you’ve discovered, help you plan and implement your DPI project? How might the author guidelines help you in your practice?
3 page minimum requirement
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment |
Question about Statistics Discussion Assignment