Question, How do you compare film advertisements from 1930 to 1960

July 14, 2021

Question, How do you compare film advertisements from 1930 to 1960

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Bibilography with annotations

On this assignment, you must complete the project using the resources you discovered.

The last paper

Papers should develop an argument and provide evidence for it by analyzing primary documents in depth. The questions that follow should assist you in your analysis. You are not required to respond to all of the questions. They are included to aid in the development of your argument.

The final paper’s purpose is to demonstrate your ability to analyze historical documents in relation to the period of film history we’re studying in this class. The length of the paper should range from 1000 to 1500 words. Make a note of which prompt you’re responding to!

Prompt: Language Magazines in Spanish and English

Compare two or more issues of Cine-Mundial and/or another Spanish-language magazine from the same year digitized by the Margaret Herrick Library to two or more issues of an English-language fan magazine from the same year if you read Spanish.

The questions that follow should assist you in your analysis. You are not required to respond to all of the questions. They are included to aid in the development of your argument.

Do the two publications promote the same movies and actors?

Do they all pitch movies the same way?

Do they both have the same sponsors?

What are the differences between the two magazines, and how would you explain them?

Question, How do you compare film advertisements from 1930 to 1960

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met