Researchers and Pundits Argument on Wisdom of Crowds Assignment

Researchers and Pundits Argument on Wisdom of Crowds Assignment

Instructions:

Researchers and Pundits Argument on Wisdom of Crowds Assignment

1. Researchers and pundits both argue that the wisdom of crowds is extremely fragile. The two specific circumstances include when people are influenced by the opinion of others which means they lose their independence and when opinions are distorted by cognitive biases which highlights the strong political views held by a group (Becker & Edwards, 2019).
2. New research zeros in and concludes that the wisdom of crowds is more robust than previously thought, it can even withstand the groupthink of similar-minded people. The caveat is that in order for the wisdom of crowds to retain its accuracy for making predictions, every member of the group must be given an equal voice, without any one person dominating. As the research discovered, the pattern of social influence within groups that is, who talks to whom and when is the key determinant of the crowd’s accuracy in making predictions (Becker & Edwards, 2019).
3. My thoughts as a leader after reading this article is that it can be sometimes difficult to lead a group of people if you have many influencers apart of that group. These select individuals can be a deciding factor in many of group discussions especially if individuals in the group find them more influencing.

Now, I am the most influential I sort of have complete power of the group because most of them may mimic whatever I do but then sometimes that is not the case. Individuals may find someone else who they see as more opinionated and may want to follow them. That then makes the job as a leader more difficult. We’re not always going to be in situations where we can choose if we would like to be a part of centralized or decentralized networks. So, based on that the job of leadership because challenging but it is something that can be fixed and work out for the better.

References:

Boyatzis, R. (n.d.). Weather head School of Management | Weather head School at … Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://weatherhead.case.edu/departments/organizational-behavior/workingPapers/WP%2099-6.pdf

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Researchers and Pundits Argument on Wisdom of Crowds Assignment

Researchers and Pundits Argument on Wisdom of Crowds Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!