Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Resolving Of Crimes in the Criminal Justice System
Running Head: ABSTRACT 1
ABSTRACT 6
Week 12 Project Abstract
Students Name: Ruthvik Reddy Gidde
Institution: New England College
Date: 07/29/2021
Technology has greatly changed each aspect of individuals’ lives, together with the resolving of crimes in the criminal justice system. These advancements in technology have made solving crimes simple and easy. Forensic tools and technology are used in the forensic science process to produce samples and proof to resolve offenses. Some of the measurements that are utilized in this process include dealing with body fluids, analyzing drugs or chemicals, DNA identification, fingerprinting, and analysis of evidence. There are several forensic tools and technologies that are used in the criminal justice system today, and they include Phenom desktop SEM, alternative light photography, digital surveillance for gaming equipment, facial reconstruction, and DNA sequencing. Other technologies consist of high-powered microscopes, 3D scanners, drug testing, link analysis software, and automated fingerprint identification (Prasanthi, 2016). The Phenom SEM is considered the most appropriate instrument for forensic experts since it is easy to apply, fast, and a high-quality imaging device with the additional capacity of defining basic composition. Through that, experts are able to solve criminal cases reliably and quickly.
There are certain advantages and disadvantages in relation to forensic tools and technology because this field is relatively new, and criminal cases are normally addressed with physical evidence. The primary advantage of forensic tools and technologies is the capability to search and examine a collection of data proficiently and quickly (Umar, Riadi, & Zamroni, 2018). Experts are enabled to look out for keywords in a hard drive in various languages, which is significant since cyber-crimes can easily go beyond the internet. The valued information that has been lost and deleted by criminals may be recovered, which becomes significant evidence in judicial courts. Additionally, the use of reports acquired by forensic tools is important because one can easily trace back the originality of data. Nevertheless, forensic tools and technologies have some disadvantages, such as high costs of recovering data and inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents. Other limitations include suffering some volatility and tampering with reports prior to the investigation.
References
Prasanthi, B. V. (2016). Cyber forensic tools: a review. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), 41(5), 266-271.
Umar, R., Riadi, I., & Zamroni, G. M. (2018). Mobile forensic tools evaluation for digital crime investigation. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, 8(3), 949.
Resolving Of Crimes in the Criminal Justice System
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Resolving Of Crimes in the Criminal Justice System